Today's print edition

For at least the last decade, our politics has been gripped by a malady I call "The-End-Is-Near-ism.” It’s fueled by Democrats and Republicans (incumbents, candidates, activists) declaring the next election the most important of our lifetime. That’s how the fever starts, anyway. Then, as the body politic’s temperature rises, we’re told the election is that important because if the opposition wins, the U.S. as we know it will cease to exist. Lately, we’ve been told that the next election is more important than all the rest because, if the opposition wins, there might not be more elections.googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1499653692894-0'); });

Paul Sracic, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington, calls this phenomenon "Armageddon politics,” explaining to me in an email exchange that the danger this attitude poses "lies not just in its rhetoric but in the actions it inspires.”

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.

Your subscription plan doesn't allow commenting. To learn more see our FAQ

広告出稿に関するおといあわせはこちらまで